![Woman's eyelid with silver color glitters](https://www.retailconsumerproductslaw.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/22/2019/03/GettyImages-857510484.jpg)
Earlier this month, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California ruled in favor of Marc Jacobs and its retailers, refusing to grant summary judgment to Korean luxury skin-care company Amarte USA Holdings, Inc. on its claim that Marc Jacobs’ EYE-CONIC eye shadow infringed Amarte’s rights to its trademarked EYECONIC eye cream. Ruling on cross-motions for summary judgment, U.S. District Judge Charles R. Breyer found that there was no likelihood of confusion between the products, so Marc Jacobs and the retailers were not liable for trademark infringement or other claims hinging on consumer confusion.Continue Reading Northern District of California Wipes Away EYECONIC / EYE-CONIC Trademark Litigation